Judging Code of Conduct
- Judges are held at the highest standards when voting.
- There is a zero-tolerance policy* for sexual harassment and discrimination among our judges. Should it come to our attention that a judge violates these expectations of conduct, he or she will be removed from the committee immediately.
- Judges are not eligible to vote in any category in which they are nominated.
- Judges are only eligible to vote in the categories or awards their committee is assigned.
- Judges are only eligible to vote for bars they have visited. If a judge has not been to 5 of the bars, tasted products etc, a judge is required to abstain from voting in that category.
- Any harassing, campaigning, or other activities meant to sway a judge’s opinion and vote may be considered soliciting, and must be reported to Charlotte Voisey, Chairman, Eileen Wayner, Spirited Awards® Director.
- Judges are encouraged to conduct outside research, if they deem it necessary.
- Judges are encouraged to carefully read the writing samples and menu submissions for categories that apply. These files will be made available through the voting program.
- Judges should not discuss votes, particularly any tiebreakers for the winner (if necessary), with anyone.
- Judges should refrain from discussing nominees and potential winners on social media outlets (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, etc.) in the context of the Spirited Awards®.
- Judges are urged to consider the character of the nominees when voting (e.g. adherence to no-tolerance on sexual harassment, promotes diversity, etc.)
*In January of 2020, Tales of the Cocktail Foundation is partnering with a national expert to reevaluate its existing sexual misconduct policies with the goals of providing comprehensive and transparent prevention & response policies, and processes.